 |
Article written by Juniper and published in the Warmer Bulletin, September 2002
Mechanical Biological Treatment - Applicability to Household Waste
|
Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT) systems have been under development in Germany for some ten years as an alternative to incineration.
Recently these concepts have attracted considerable attention in other areas of the world and have received support from NGOs and other environmental organisations. Yet there is much confusion about what these systems can do, originating in part from the fact that several different process concepts are described as MBT. This article aims to address this confusion by describing the different types of MBT systems available and put them into context of managing household waste.
At its simplest, MBT merely describes the mechanical waste preparation and biological treatment parts of a standard Integrated Approach to Waste Management. But the concept of MBT offers the opportunity for a more holistic approach of combining systems to recover the maximum potential from waste based on specific circumstances. This has evolved from the simple combination of mechanical preparation, material separation and composting, to an integrated system with three or more waste fractions, which can be recycled, composted and from which energy can be recovered. Some systems can offer a reasonably flexible approach to waste management due to their high tolerance of variation in waste composition. This means they can be adapted to take black bag waste, but can also accept the implementation of additional kerbside collections or green waste composting.
MBT was originally developed as a way of treating residual municipal wastes after source segregated recycling had taken place in order to recovery further value and to by-pass incineration of the residue stream. The process is basically a combination of:
|
- Waste preparation and separation
- Recovery of two or more waste streams for further utilisation or landfill
- Stabilisation of the bio-degradable fraction
|
|
In spite of originally being developed for residual MSW, some MBT systems have the ability to operate without extensive kerbside collection or source segregation, as is often the case in the UK. In fact the more advanced systems can also function without any additional collection infrastructure; they are also suited to the un-segregated household waste stream or “black bag” waste. For those authorities with high kerbside recycling participation MBT allows the authority to increase its recycling rate without significant additional effort which would normally be required to boost kerbside collection effectiveness. Low recycling authorities can improve their recycling performance without the need for costly source segregation infrastructure especially in areas where space or geography make kerbside collection impractical.
The Advantages offered by MBT systems
In the UK, MBT facilities, when used as part of an integrated approach to waste management, have many advantages for local authorities. These include:
|
|
Accept wide variation in
waste input
|
The systems will tolerate a wide variation in the collection of dry recyclables and so do not inhibit changes in the level of dry recycling initiatives, but could reduce the investment in recycling infrastructure such as MRFs etc. |
|
|
|
MBT systems are aiming at a significant weight loss during the biological stage which should count towards the diversion of biodegradable waste from landfill and reduce landfill tax costs if the residues are going to landfill |
|
| Source segregation of putrescibles not needed |
MBT systems do not require the householder to segregate kitchen waste/ garden waste which is prone to contamination and therefore negates the need and expense of separate collection for the collection authority |
|
| Increased recycling |
Recyclables in the waste stream before or after source segregation schemes can be removed during the sorting stage and count towards recycling targets |
|
| Landfill diversion |
The residue stream is reduced and waste is diverted from landfill, it therefore helps to meet the targets of the Landfill Directive |
|
|
Even with successful kerbside schemes there are still quantities of residual materials which could be recycled from the waste stream. Some of the systems are able to recover 15% to 20% from the residual waste for recycling if metals, inerts and plastics are removed. Metals are the easiest materials to remove using these systems and could boost local authority recycling rates by around 5% or more when used to manage residual waste from those authorities using kerbside collection. However individual recycling rates will depend on waste composition and the individual process technology used.
The capacity of MBT facilities ranges from very small plants treating 10,000 tonnes per annum or less to large scale integrated facilities with capacities of up to 150,000 tonnes and more. Some of them are modular systems which can be adapted to fluctuations in the waste stream and individual project requirements.
As independent technology analysts, Juniper has recently conducted a review of a number of MBT systems from around the world. We have found it helpful to group the systems that are commercially available into three main categories of MBT systems.
These can be classified as ranging from basic ‘grassroots’ MBT facilities to those based on more ‘high tech’ and innovative ideas. They all however combine material separation with stabilisation of the biodegradable fraction.
The Three Main Categories of MBT systems
|
|
|
Combined Mechanical separation with a discrete biological activity of residual fraction
- Discrete functions
- No energy recovery
- Significant residue stream to landfill
|
|
|
|
Closed cycle
|
Integrated stages of traditional based techniques as a turnkey concept
- Integrated system
- Optimised odour controls
- Energy recovery using AD
- Reduce residues
|
|
|
| Innovative |
New approaches to biological and /or mechanical stages which further reduce waste going to landfill and recover more value in the form of energy
- Integrated innovative design
- Higher degree of waste separation and reduced residue stream
- Additional energy recovery options
|
|
|
The ‘simple’ systems tend to be low-cost with little automation and are literally a materials recovery system with adjacent biological treatment often within the same building. The components of these systems are often ordered separately either directly by a public authority or through a project developer who is buying in the sorting and separation facility as well as the chosen biological treatment, mostly windrow or in-vessel composting.
With rising environmental standards and higher recycling requirements, integrated systems have been developed that combine the two technology stages as an integrated entity and include emissions and odour control facets within a closed cycle. Some of these systems propose Anaerobic Digestion for the biological treatment. These MBT systems are supplied by more specialised companies, which have developed the combined process in order to improve economic and environmental efficiency.
Innovative approaches have taken these concepts further and have developed systems with higher degrees of material separation and air pollution controls in order to minimise environmental impact. Some of these new systems produce an RDF type material, which can be used for energy recovery and fuel replacement purposes, to reduce further the environmental impacts of the waste. Some of these latest MBT systems have changed the order of separation and biological activity in order to improve the recovery of non-degradable materials and therefore reduce the amount of residues going to landfill. These systems use the biological properties of the waste for drying purpose to reduce contamination by clagging organics in the subsequent material separation. Others have improved the biological degradation by using special designs using semi-permeable membranes etc.
Several companies have also announced process concepts which further integrate the MBT system with thermal recovery of the residual fraction in either an adjacent combustion unit or a gasifier. None of these concepts has yet been implemented, but the idea of MBT and gasification has attracted a lot interest throughout the world.
Today numerous companies in Europe and elsewhere are able to deliver MBT systems and components. These suppliers range from equipment makers, supplying parts for the ‘simple’ combined shredding/separation and biological treatment operations, to project developers and turnkey suppliers delivering plants with an integrated energy recovery capability. Some companies have entered the MBT market with long-term knowledge concerning the mechanical separation and sorting stages, whereas the majority of MBT suppliers has developed their system from composting and anaerobic digestion technologies and have added the mechanical component through purchasing and licensing agreements with outside suppliers. However, the leading companies can be distinguished from the traditional component suppliers by their explicit knowledge of process integration, environmental management, plant operation and experience in combining both MBT stages into one efficient process flow.
Because the concept originated in Germany, the majority of technologies have been developed there. Today, there are over 25 MBT facilities operating today. Other established markets include Austria and Switzerland, closely followed by the Netherlands. Emerging markets include other European markets such as Italy and the UK, but also overseas countries such as Australia.
|
|
Active Suppliers of MBT systems include:
|
|
|
|
Process |
Country |
Babcock Borsig/ Steinmüller Valorga
|
Valorga |
Austria |
| Biodegma/ Umweltschutz Nord |
Biodegma |
Germany |
| CCP Waste Management |
CCP/EUREC |
Germany |
| Eco-Deco |
EcoCubi/Ecotorre |
Italy |
| Farmatic/ Schwarting Umwelt |
Schwarting MBA concept |
Germany |
| Wilhelm Faber GmbH&Co |
Faber Ambra |
Germany |
| Fa. Gore |
Gores |
Germany |
| Herhof Umwellttechnik |
Trockenstabilat |
Germany |
| Holding Nehlsen |
MBS |
Germany |
| Horstmann Recyclingtechnik |
MBV/EBS |
Germany |
| Innovate Umwelttechnik |
BASEP 2000 |
Austria |
| Linde-KCA-Dresden GmbH |
Linde MBA concept |
Germany |
| Lurgi Entsorgung GmbH |
Lurgi MBA concept |
Germany |
| Porr Umwelttechnik |
Bio-Puster |
Austria |
| Sotec |
Sotec MBA concept |
Germany |
| Technische Universitaet Dresden |
Dombelueftung |
Germany |
| U-plus/ Global Renewables |
ISKA/ UR-3R |
Germany, Australia |
| Vandenbrook / Grontmij |
VADEB/VAGM |
Netherlands |
| VKW |
VKW MBA concept |
Austria |
| Wehrle Werk AG |
Biopercolat |
Germany |
| Source: Juniper database |
|
|
|
The suppliers can also be distinguished by the type and quality of materials produced by these plants. The materials produced have a number of uses depending on the purpose of the process and the resulting quality. In particular, the RDF produced by the advanced MBT systems, such as EcoDeco and Herhof amongst others, have led to intensive discussions about the environmental impact of utilisation of MBT residues.
MBT Residue Utilisation
|
Landfill and landfill cover
|
|
Additional biological stabilisation
|
|
| Site remediation and horticultural applications |
|
| Homogenous fuel for novel and conventional thermal technologies |
|
| Co-combustion or co-gasification with biomass and other fuels |
|
Greenpeace have stated that their preferred route of disposal of MBT residues is landfill and not energy recovery. This viewpoint has been critised by others, who point out that under EU policy the maximum value should be recovered from waste. The many industry experts and the thermal treatment industry who favour energy recovery using traditional grate systems or even novel processes such as pyrolysis. The Calorific Value of those RDF type MBT residues can range between 12-16MJ/kg dependent on waste input and moisture levels. Many feel that the recovery of energy from this material, is the most sustainable option and have optimised their systems to produce high calorific fractions for this particular purpose. There is much scope for different ways of recovering the energy from the MBT residual fraction. These range from RDF-type combustion or co-combustion (in power plants or cement kilns) through to gasification. Our client specific consultancy work has shown that which method is the most beneficial from an environmental and economic perspective varies on a case-by-case basis.
Another important factor is the air pollution control measures supplied with an MBT system. The following methods are used by MBT suppliers:
|
- Biofilter
- Bio washer
- Thermal combustion
- Catalytic combustion
- Adsorption
- Absorption
|
|
Only a few countries such as Germany have specific emission limits and technical guidance for these types of facilities (30. BImSchG). But in most countries no specific requirements have been put in place and it is up to the individual project developer to choose the most appropriate system. Often the regulatory position is unclear and will in future only be clarified by the first test cases. In the UK, Shanks Waste Management has been promoting the EcoDeco systems and is planning to build the first plants in the near future. These use biofilters as their air pollution control measures. Other suppliers such as Herhof have developed their own air pollution measures; in this case the Trockenstabilat process comes with the proprietary LARA system (Luftaufbereitungs- und Reinigungsanlage), which includes a thermal combustor to reduce emissions and therefore the environmental impact of such facilities.
The variety of concepts, mainly developed in continental Europe, offer a wide range of approaches to MBT. With over 70 MBT facilities in Europe this technology can be described as proven. But is has to be taken into account that with over 20 MBT suppliers, the individual process technologies are not necessarily all commercial. Only a few companies have built more than 5 plants, of which at least one or two are pilot and/or demonstrator projects. In many cases reference lists for MBT processes include partial equipment delivery for MBT components such as shredders and composting facilities. This can be very confusing for customers and other potentially interested parties.
However with the target dates for the European Landfill Directive drawing closer, the biodegradable fraction of waste in general and residual MSW in particular is certainly a problem that could be solved with Mechanical Biological Treatment. As MBT complements waste minimisation and increased source segregation, recycling and composting activities, it seems to be an integrated waste management technique with huge potential. Not only in the UK and continental Europe, but increasingly overseas. The US, Canada and Australia might not have Landfill Directives such as their European counterparts, but they certainly have the problem of dealing efficiently with their growing mountains of waste and they are searching for readily available, cost-effective solutions with low environmental impact such as MBT.
|
The Warmer Bulletin is published by Residua Limited which provides the secretariat to the Resource Recovery Forum, a registered environmental body.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Waste Management Reports are also available from ... |
  |
 |
|
Juniper Consultancy Services Limited,
Bathurst House, Stancombe, Gloucestershire GL6 7NH England Tel +44 1452 770078 Fax +44 1453 860882 Email: info@juniper.co.uk
Registered office:Sheppards Mill, Uley, Gloucestershire GL11 5SP, England
Company registration number: 2580687
© Copyright 2002-2009 Juniper Consultancy Services Limited
|
|
|